Is Servant Leadership Dead?

In my book, Here Be Dragons, I wrote in the chapter devoted to leadership that “In order to attract and retain high-performing employees, you have to learn how to serve them… If people know that you are there to support them and have their backs—as long as they are honest and hard-working—this will create the kind of discretionary effort that is required for companies to succeed against all odds.”

However, recent years have seen a surge of high-profile leaders favoring authority and speed over humility and service. Some analysts observe a rise in hierarchical, results-driven cultures, particularly in Silicon Valley and fast-scaling startups. With celebrity CEOs dominating headlines and agile business models emphasizing short-term results, servant leadership may seem outdated or eclipsed.​

But is this trend reflective of reality, or a distortion amplified by the visibility of certain leaders? Industry research, leadership development programs, and global surveys indicate the opposite: servant leadership is not vanishing, but transforming—and increasingly valued where innovation, retention, and culture matter most.​

Defining Servant Leadership

Servant leadership, first articulated by Robert K. Greenleaf in 1970, flips conventional power hierarchies. Instead of employees serving a leader, the leader serves employees – focusing on empathy, empowerment, and nurturing long-term growth. Key hallmarks include active listening, ethical behavior, and fostering trust. At its core, this style asks: “How can I help you succeed?”

It’s about cultivating environments where people thrive and purpose flourishes.​

Thriving in Complexity

Today’s organizations face unprecedented challenges: AI disruption, hybrid workplace demands, mental health concerns, and the volatility created by economic and social shifts. Servant leadership’s adaptability—its ability to support psychological safety and resilience—positions it as a foundational style for navigating change.​

Leaders who serve rather than manage unlock higher levels of trust, collaboration, and employee engagement. Research from Gallup has repeatedly found stagnant engagement and declining workplace well-being, costing the global economy trillions in lost productivity. Servant leaders naturally foster the connection and purpose needed to reverse these trends.​

Shifting Workforce Expectations

Younger generations—especially Gen Z—demand more than transactional leadership. They seek ethical, purpose-driven workplaces, and reject environments where command-and-control attitudes prevail. According to HR services giant Insperity, Gen Z workers respond best to a blend of transformational and servant leadership, craving mentorship, a sense of belonging, and authenticity.​

These priorities permeate even traditional industries, reshaping incentives and culture toward inclusion, growth, and social impact. Organizations able to meet these expectations retain top talent, boost loyalty, and develop new leaders from within.​

Beyond Soft Skills

Critics sometimes deride servant leadership as “too soft,” worrying it sacrifices results for harmony. Yet the data suggests otherwise. Servant leaders consistently outperform on productivity, retention, and development of engaged teams.​

  • Employee turnover is lower in organizations prioritizing a people-first, inclusive culture.​
  • Engagement spikes when leaders actively listen, empower others, and delegate authority with trust and transparency.​
  • Innovation flourishes in environments where psychological safety is high, encouraging risk-taking and dissent—key characteristics of servant-led teams.​

The competitive edge is clear: servant leadership is not antithetical to performance; rather, it is the pathway to making performance sustainable.​

Leadership Style Comparisons

Servant leadership aligns strongly with transformational values, but distinguishes itself by emphasizing empowerment, ethical conduct, and community-building. Its holistic approach contrasts with both transactional and authoritarian styles, which often struggle to retain talent and foster innovation over time.

Gallup Research Findings

​Gallup polls and research consistently show that servant leadership is highly effective, driving notable improvements in employee engagement, productivity, loyalty, and retention compared to traditional management styles.​

Increased Engagement and Productivity

  • According to Gallup surveys, organizations grounded in servant leadership report up to a 20% boost in employee engagement and 28% higher productivity compared to conventional leadership models.​
  • Servant leadership also leads to faster problem-solving, with teams resolving issues 30% more quickly due to increased trust and collaboration.​

Higher Retention and Satisfaction

  • Gallup data show that workplaces led by servant leaders have up to a 25% increase in employee retention, and employees are 54% less likely to leave their jobs when their well-being and growth are prioritized.​
  • These companies also achieve up to a 50% increase in employee satisfaction, largely because employees feel valued and supported.​

Building Loyalty and Reducing Turnover

  • Employee loyalty is stronger: 80% of workers in servant-led organizations express higher loyalty to their leaders, contributing to long-term commitment and reduced turnover.​
  • Gallup’s findings confirm that prioritizing employee development, engagement, and ethical treatment—hallmarks of servant leadership—leads to lower attrition and more sustainable performance.​

Specific Impact on Younger Workers

  • Millennials and Gen Z employees show increased workplace engagement when servant leadership characteristics are present, such as emotional healing, empowerment, and helping employees grow.​
  • These traits are statistically linked—according to Gallup analyses—to higher commitment and a greater likelihood of high-performing employees staying with the organization.​

In summary, Gallup’s foundational research consistently validates the effectiveness of servant leadership: organizations with servant leaders enjoy heightened engagement, stronger performance, increased loyalty, and lower turnover across employee demographics and sectors.

Other Recent Research

An extensive meta-analysis published earlier this year by the University of Illinois- Chicago covering 85 independent studies (N=16,803) found servant leadership strongly increases employee job satisfaction, commitment, organizational identification, job performance, creativity, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB).​

The analysis also found that employees with servant leaders are substantially less likely to quit and view their leaders as fairer and more trustworthy compared to transformational leaders.​ It highlights the distinct and significant advantages of servant leadership over other value-driven leadership styles.

Another recent meta-analysis, published in the Journal of Comparative International Management, reported servant leadership’s positive relationships with group and unit-level outcomes (e.g., unit performance, team climate, reduced collective turnover) and demonstrated these findings across diverse cultural contexts. The analyses also confirmed the validity of this style over other leadership styles, particularly in terms of trust, justice perception, and performance.​

Challenges and Critiques

No leadership style is perfect or immune to evolving expectations, and some styles work better than others with certain employees, in specific situations, and in certain types of businesses and organizations. Research shows, for example, that servant leadership is particularly effective in the healthcare, service, hospitality, technology, and retail industries.

In addition, critics warn that servant leadership can morph into unhelpful self-sacrifice if taken too far, setting a standard by which leaders attempt to solve every crisis themselves or sacrifice their own well-being to meet the needs of their employees .

More nuanced critiques point out that “serving some” while neglecting others can breed new forms of exclusion, and genuine servant leadership demands vigilant inclusivity and fairness. The style also requires clear boundaries: guidance and empowerment must not devolve into lack of accountability.​

Evolving Servant Leadership

Far from dying, servant leadership is reinventing itself in response to new realities. In hybrid, AI-enabled environments, leaders must inspire, build psychological safety, and adapt continuously. Servant leadership now places greater emphasis on transparency, listening, and modeling ethical standards in a rapidly shifting landscape.​

Key skills for today’s servant leaders include:

  • Vision and purpose – Guiding teams with clarity about organizational values and goals.​
  • Adaptability – Thriving amid change, inviting feedback, and remaining open to new ideas.​
  • Community building – Facilitating collaboration and trust across remote, diverse, and multigenerational teams.​
  • Active empowerment – Delegating real authority, promoting autonomy, and championing both individual and collective growth.​

What’s the Verdict?

Servant leadership is not dead; in fact, it is integral to building resilient, high-performing organizations, as old models fall short in the face of disruption, employee activism, and heightened demands for inclusion and transparency. The era of ego-driven empire builders may dominate headlines, but beneath the surface, those committed to service-first leadership cultivate the trust, engagement, and innovation needed for enduring success.​

The growing chorus among business educators, HR experts, and global CEOs is unmistakable: servant leadership not a relic – it is a blueprint for sustainable growth, belonging, and competitive advantage. Those who embrace its principles, adapt them to new challenges, and set clear boundaries will shape the future of leadership for the next generation.​

As stated in my book, “I’m not saying you don’t need to define the vision or make the tough calls, but your main job as a leader is to set aggressive but realistic goals, make sure your direct reports have the resources they need to achieve them, and then monitor their efforts and progress in a supportive manner.”

Originally posted on Forbes.com